Hagakure: What is it?
     
The Hagakure ( 理 論 - which is alternatively translated as "Hidden Leaves", "Hidden by Leaves", or "In the Shadow of Leaves") was a series of anecdotes, informal articles, and letters written by Yamamoto Tsunetomo - a trusted retainer of Nabeshima Mitsushige, third Daimyo of the area now called Saga Perfecture - as a set of memoirs and reflections. It was written over a period of time, compiled between 1714 and 1716, and circulated posthumously in late 1716. Although some say it was published on September 17th of that year, I find this a bit "optimistically accurate" as I do not believe it was formally "published" but rather perused, compiled, and disseminated informally by Tsuramoto Motazaemon Tashiro.

Occasionally, the components of Hagakure where written with the intention of sharing advice with subordinates, but most often where entries in a sort of informal journal where Yamamoto essentially ranted about what he saw as the shortcomings of his contemporaries, and where improvements should be made.

To truly appreciate the implications inherent in the book, one should examine Yamamoto's time and outlook:

Yamamoto Tsunetomo was born in June of 1659 in Katatae (about a ten minute walk from Nabeshima Castle, where he would later serve) and entered into the service of Lord Nabeshima Mitsushige at the age of nine in the year 1668 - nearly seven decades after the Tokugawa had unified Japan under one rule. Peace was tantamount, and while warfare and border struggles - military service as the Samurai understood it - was essentially a thing of the past, the Samurai class was still a very essential part of Japanese culture. Yamamoto never actually participated in a battle himself, as the last of the struggling factions against Tokugawa Unification fell in 1638 – 21 years before his birth.

The Samurai, however, where still raised in the fashion they had been for centuries beforehand. Service and military excellence where 2expected, and the ideals of selfless service to one’s Lord where held in high regard. However, they where also struggling to re-define their role in society, and it was in this light that Yamamoto wrote the entries which later would become Hagakure.

There where essentially two pervasive attitudes in Japanese society at the time.

One view asked that, if Japan is unified and local governance is irrelevant under a central seat of government, then wouldn’t the Samurai – being provincial lords and retainers under such lords – be irrelevant? This view generally held that the Samurai where an unnecessary drain on the societies that supported them, and that they should be either disbanded or made to support themselves.

The other view said that the Samurai – even if militarily irrelevant in light of provincial peace – should remain as governors, as well as figureheads and examples of proper, stable, “right-minded right-living”. The life of a Samurai should be an example of piety, artistry, eloquence, etiquette, etc.

It was during this social transformation that Yamamoto found himself watching the Samurai around him. As a member of the Samurai class himself, he naturally wished for his class to be held as the epitome of what was proper and right. He desired that the Samurai should be militaristically relevant, but also socially exquisite in deportment and demeanor – an example of all that is correct and proper with the glitterati of his time.

Two years before commencement on the work that led to Hagakure, he wrote Gukensho (translated loosely as "A Collection of my Humble Opinions"), and together, the man’s writings paint a vivid picture of Samurai life, the example Samurai should make of themselves, and the proper execution of their stations and duties.

He had received instruction under two masters – Tannen, who was head priest of the Kodenji sect of Buddhism (from whom he later received ketsu myaku - “blood relations” – a deep and endearing honor) and Ittei (formerly named Ishida Yamayuki) who had been Confucian scholar. This being the case, it is clear that his instruction when far beyond simple military and political matters, and ran deeply in the spiritual and philosophical as well. Yamamoto desired that all Samurai should learn essential spiritual, philosophical, artistic, and literary matters as well as military, political, and social matters. This, he felt, was essential to the survival of the Samurai class as a whole.

Reading Hagakure, we should understand his unquestionable loyalty to his Lord – the primary concern of any Samurai, be he living in times of peace, war, or in some form of social uncertainty. Most of the orations in Hagakure refer to his Lords father and those before him as military leaders of great renown, but also as men possessed of great non-military strength as well. For instance, Lord Noashige is cited as having individually slain over 200 men in a single battle. He is also cited as being most brave and illustrious as a Samurai who would well have known the secrets to right-living as defined by the Samurai Code, of which, Bushido was only one of many parts. Noashige, Yamamoto points out, had taught that in a practical way, men must drive themselves onward, and through such induced strength, find the true spirit of Bushido that would take a hold in their minds regardless of their endeavors.

  In conclusion, Hagakure as I view it, is not simply a Samurai’s Handbook, but rather it is several things:
  1. An open reprimand for those up-and-coming younger Samurai who may be living too cushy a life of opulent leisure, having lost sight of a true Samurai’s goals and ideals of hard work and servitude to his Lord.
  2. A personal journal in which we may see some of the frustrations that a man living in Yamamoto’s time faced concerning the possible disintegration of a way of life he held dear and saw as an integral part of Japanese survival.
  3. The thoughts of a respected and learned man of his time, who was trying to sway the lives and opinions of those under him, either through direct oration, indirect writings, or exemplified anecdotes.

When Nabeshima Mitsushige died in early May of 1700, Yamamoto Tsunetomo requested the right to commit Oibaru (Seppuku after the death of one’s Lord, with the intention of following that Lord to the grave) but was denied, as the Tokugawa had outlawed the practice of Seppuku in all forms in 1663. He says in Hagakure, “I feel forlorn to see that no one wants to follow his Lord to the grave. There are no retainers that have followed their Lord since the prohibition of seppuku.” In deference to the Tokugawa ban on seppuku – and to protect his family thereafter – Yamamoto decided that the only way to fulfill his duty to his Lord was to seclude himself – to enter the priesthood, withdraw from society, and relinquish his Samurai duties.

Within a coupe of weeks, the then 42 year old Yamamoto was permitted to do just that, and enter the Kodenji priesthood. His head was shaved at Koden-ji (the Nabeshima clan temple, for which the sect was named), and two days later, he took the Buddhist vows that changed his name to Jocho Kyokuzan. After completing the necessary ceremonies, he moved to Kurotsuchibaru (also near present day Saga City) and remained in semi-seclusion thereafter.

Ten years later, a young scribe named Tsuramoto Motazaemon Tashiro visited Jocho, and requested that his senior recite his thoughts. Tsuramoto spent considerable time writing and organizing all that was set before him – both in the form of scattered scrolls and notes previously worked on, and in the form of oration directly from Jocho’s thoughts. With Jocho’s final approval upon completion, this work became Hagakure.

Two years after Tsuramoto’s departure, the aesthetic priest Jocho Kyokuzan –former Samurai Yamamoto Tsunetomo – died of old age, never realizing that his orations would become a staple of study for all interested in the outlook of the Samurai of his time. Perhaps if he had known this, he would have dictated his thoughts differently. Some believe so, but we’ll never really know.

Hagakure is also (perhaps more accurately) known as Hagakure Kikigaki Koho, which is translated loosely as “The writings that were heard from the Shadow of Leaves”, referring to the fact that it is a written account of the orations of Yamamoto to another. Hagakure is – honestly – a convenient truncation of the proper title. The kanji for Hagakure of course has many meanings, among them are intoku (“hidden virtue”), kakushi book (“hidden service”) kakushi toku (“hidden love”). In the metaphysical aspects of our martial training, we often hear of Hagakure Mushi (“non-self”) and Hagakure Muga (“selflessness”)

The original manuscript has unfortunately been lost to antiquity, and in modern translations, there are four differing transcripts. In all, Hagakure consists of thirteen hundred entries in eleven volumes. However, there are many parts that have not been translated into English, so any study of the book in English form will be – unfortunately – truncated as will any real understanding of it’s contents.